Every month I have an emergency preparedness article in the local newspaper (ChevyChase.Patch.com). Here’s the link to my May article. I’ve also copied it below:

Since Maryland passed its mandatory seat belt law in 1997, the annual number of traffic-related injuries in Maryland has decreased by more than 26 percent (MD State Highway Administration).

The famous security guard statue at the intersection of South Park Avenue and The Hills Plaza is getting some company this summer—in the form of uniformed police officers from the Montgomery County Police Department.

As part of the Maryland “Click It or Ticket” campaign, residents may notice police officers standing outside their parked patrol vehicles—especially at the intersection of South Park Avenue and The Hills Plaza in Chevy Chase, where officers have established a checkpoint several weeks in a row. Police officers are monitoring passing vehicles for seat belt use and are conducting traffic stops when they spot violations.

Montgomery County police officers are targeting certain intersections for approximately two hours at a time. In Chevy Chase, officers say they prefer the intersection near the the security guard statue because it offers clear lines of sight for seeing if drivers are
wearing their seat belts, and vehicles are traveling at slower speeds than on larger roads, such as Wisconsin Avenue.

According to Charles County, MD’s traffic website, seat belt fines are $25 but can be more if minors in the vehicle are not buckled in. Throughout May and June, Maryland law enforcement officers will be aggressively enforcing Maryland’s seat belt laws.

Todd Jasper is a federal emergency manager and has been happy to call Chevy Chase home since 2008. His emergency management blog is www.toddjasper.com.

Many companies and even Federal agencies have identified volunteers on every floor of their buildings to act as “floor wardens” during a fire alarm. One agency has  instructions on their website to their floor wardens about their duties during a fire alarm:

The floor warden team is responsible for checking where the fire activation is, checking with other floor wardens that the building is empty, and liaising with the Fire Department. A member of the team will also record the event and investigate if  necessary.

This conduct is common for floor wardens. They are expected to perform a search for people, investigate the source of fire, urge people to evacuate that haven’t left their desks, and rescue those that are trapped.

What equipment do they have? A reflective vest, flashlight, and perhaps a whistle!

What training do they have? They are shown the location of the stairwells, told where outside they should send people, and are instructed to write down the names of people that refuse to evacuate.

In my opinion, the floor warden system is seriously flawed and extremely dangerous. There are so many issues with the system, it’s hard to know where to start.

First, it’s hard enough for the professional rescue squad that the fire department sends to perform search and rescue–and rescue squads have extensive training and equipment (such as air supply, tools, radios, helmets, fire resistent person protective equipment, and other specialized equipment). Floor wardens have none of this equipment or training.

Additionally, rescue squads function as a team of professionals and have an ability to relay information up the chain of command. A rescue squad can receive an order from the chief to abort a rescue and regroup in safety. The floor wardens usually operate alone (rarely in pairs) and are lucky to even have a radio.

The idea that floor wardens are supposed to investigate a fire is absolutely ludicrous. If a fire department announced that, in order to save money, when it receives a call for fire, the fire department would first dispatch a civilian with no fire training and no personal protective equipment to enter the burning building and investigate, the community would be rightfully outraged. Yet that same mission is given to floor wardens when the fire alarm sounds.

In addition to a lack of equipment and woefully inadequate training, the liability of the floor warden system is absolutely extraordinary. Let’s take a step back and analyze their roles: when the fire alarm sounds, the floor wardens are instructed by their bosses NOT TO EVACUATE. OSHA requires that employees operating in an environment with smoke and/or fire have proper personal protective equipment (PPE) such as respiratory protection, eye protection, helmets, and fire retardent clothing. Fire doubles in size about every 30 seconds–and unequipped floor wardens are sitting ducks. Operating on the fireground without proper PPE is not just dangerous, but really foolish and comes with incredible liability for a company that orders some employees to stay put during a fire.

Additionally, the International Fire Code is very clear:

23.11.401.9 International Fire Code Section – Evacuation required. In the event of activation of a fire, emergency alarm, or at the direction of the fire code official, occupants of the building or portion of the building in which the alarm is activated shall make a safe and orderly evacuation out of the building

Notice that the IFC doesn’t say “let your volunteers wander around the fire without protective equipment or extensive fire training on the lookout for folks who refuse to evacuate.”

It shouldn’t require that a floor warden perish in a fire before the emergency management field examines this practice and then prohibits it.

Unfortunately, it seems like floor wardens are supposed to be a stop-gap measure for poor emergency training among office workers. Why force everyone to undergo annual evacuation and emergency procedures training when the floor warden will just tell me what to do during an emergency? This is not the right perspective. Everyone ought to go through annual and refresher emergency training under the expectation that NO ONE will be available to remind them what to do during the emergency.

In many ways, the floor warden system establishes unreasonable expectations. For the sake of argument, let’s say that floor wardens were properly equipped and trained and worked in teams–what happens when they call in sick or go on vacation or go to lunch? Floor wardens themselves may have unrealistic–and dangerous–expectations of performing lifesaving rescues and braving the flames to help others. We ought to squash fantasies of tombstone heroism (heroic acts that end in a tombstone epitaph) and instead provide realistic and pragmatic duties (such as accountability at the evacuation rendezvous/rally point or triage outside the building). None of the pragmatic duties I mention entail people staying inside a building after the fire alarm sounds.

Some folks point out that floor wardens are useful for holding the door open to the stairwell during evacuations. The problem here is that in most buildings, during a fire alarm, the stairwells are positively pressurized to keep smoke from filling the stairwell like a chimney. If each floor warden were to hold open the doors on each floor throughout an evacuation, the positive pressurization would fail to be effective. Thus, it’s actually best if the wardens do not hold the doors open!

Others say that studies have shown that people respond better to people in authority during an evacuation–thus the need for floor wardens with vests.  That’s true, but studies have also shown that “evacuees are more likely to follow the instructions of uniformed officials (e.g., police and firefighters) than subway workers [or other non-public safety personnel], due to their perceptions of the authority and confidence of the firefighters and police officers.” If firefighters are proven to be even more successful at getting folks to evacuate, then why waste the effort with ineffective floor wardens?

The Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) training program does a good job of explaining two key principles of emergency response: “Do the greatest good for the greatest number” and “Don’t bring another victim to the scene” (meaning yourself). Floor wardens should be repurposed to do the greatest good for the greatest number that evacuate outside. Too, floor wardens can avoid bringing another victim to the scene by evacuating with everyone else when the fire alarm sounds.

In the end, I hope that building management companies, businesses, and agencies and organizations of all types abandon the floor warden system before someone gets seriously injured or killed. The myths that serve as justification to maintain the program are easily disproven and there’s no use keeping the program as a tradition when it has the potential of terrible legal liability and the potential for injury/death.

An Excerpt from the May 2012 Bulletin of the
International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM)

Here’s a plain text version as well:

Today, FEMA released the National Preparedness Report (although it is dated March 30, 2012). Nothing too intense, but good to know we’re all on the same page!

Main points:

• As the NPR coordinator, FEMA worked with the full range of whole community partners—including all levels of government, private and nonprofit sectors, faith-based organizations, communities, and individuals—to develop the NPR

• FEMA integrated data from the 2011 State Preparedness Reports (SPRs), statewide self- assessments of core capability levels submitted by all 56 U.S. states and territories through a standardized survey.

• Areas of overall national strength: planning, operational coordination, intelligence and information sharing, environmental response/health and safety, mass search and rescue operations, operational communications, public health and medical services

• These areas of national strength align closely with the Goal’s cross-cutting, common capabilities and those capabilities from the Goal’s Response mission area.

• Cybersecurity and recovery-focused core capabilities are national areas for improvement.

• Good to hear: “Key finding: Federal preparedness assistance programs have helped build and enhance state, local, tribal, and territorial capabilities through multi-year investments across mission areas.”

• Great: “Key Finding: States generally reported the most progress in capabilities that they identified as high priorities.”

• The Nation has made demonstrable progress addressing areas for improvement identified after events such as 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina. 

• FEMA recognizes the need to better support folks with special needs… “Efforts to integrate people with disabilities and other access and functional needs, children, pregnant women, older adults, and people with chronic medical conditions into preparedness activities require attention across all mission areas. “

• Good to hear: “Key finding: Decision-makers in the public and private sectors increasingly are using risk analysis to shape and prioritize preparedness activities across mission areas.”

• Pretty interesting as the final “key finding”: “Key finding: Many programs exist to build and sustain capabilities across all mission areas, but challenges remain in measuring progress from year to year.”

• Excerpted conclusion:The complex set of threats and hazards facing the Nation and the underlying interdependencies within critical infrastructure and supply chains require integrated preparedness efforts to build, sustain, and deliver the core capabilities. The components of the National Preparedness System will provide a consistent and reliable approach to support decision-making, resource allocation, and ongoing performance assessment.

Efficacy is the power to produce effect and the concept is especially important for emergency messaging. With emergency notification and warning, the desire of the sender is to empower and embolden the recipient with information, directions, and guidance in order to produce an effect.

With the proliferation of mass messaging systems capable of sending thousands of text messages, emails, and phone calls per minute, many jurisdictions and agencies have invested significant budget, time, and effort into procuring and installing these systems. While many agencies and jurisdictions have trained their staff on how to use mass messaging systems to send a message, few have provided training on what to say and how to say it.

Below are a few quick lessons on how to increase the efficacy of your emergency messages:

Lesson #1: Speed Can Trump Accuracy during Emergencies
The Virginia Tech massacre taught us how important it is to send emergency notification quickly following an act of violence or incident. As the Department of Education reported, “Because Virginia Tech failed to notify its students and staff of the initial shootings on a timely basis, thousands continued to travel on campus, without a warning of the events at the residence hall.”

On the day of the shooting, VA Tech sent an urgent email saying “A gunman is loose on campus. Stay in buildings until further notice. Stay away from all windows.” By the time that email reached students, all of the gunman’s victims had been already shot. Clearly, speed is important in providing warning. The problem is that emergency messages and warnings are inherently different to craft, especially in the middle of a hectic or stressful situation. Therefore, I recommend that all jurisdictions and agencies develop emergency notification protocols including pre-scripted (or “canned”) message templates.

As a lesson learned post-VA Tech, St. John’s University in New York had an incident of a male carrying a gun on campus. The University issued a text alert. Their text message was sent soon after the first report of the gunman: “From public safety. Male was found on campus with a rifle. Please stay in your buildings until further notice. He is in custody, but please wait until the all-clear.” According to the Associated Press, “At St. John’s, the [text] ‘messages were sent so quickly that a student who helped subdue the suspect felt his cell phone vibrate with the information while he was restraining the gunman’”.

Lesson #2: Don’t Say Please and Thank You
Emergency text messages should not be overly friendly. In the St. John’s University example, the school used the word ‘please’ twice. Using polite language such as please and thank you may sound appealing, but it can also send the wrong message. Recipients should feel instructed and compelled to follow instruction. Asking recipients to ‘please’ do something can sometimes imply that the instruction is optional. For the urgent situations requiring emergency text messaging, there can be no misunderstanding that instructions are not optional.

Lesson #3: When to Use Jargon…
Emergency managers should refrain from using institutional jargon. “Shelter-in-place” is appropriate guidance if the school has trained all students in shelter-in-place procedures and the phrase is understood. If the population receiving guidance is not familiar with emergency management jargon, it is more helpful to ask for students to simply stay indoors rather than add to confusion with institutional jargon. A message to go into lock-down may not be understood or followed as well as a message instructing students to close and lock windows and doors and await further instruction.

Lesson #4: Avoid Emotive Language
Emotive language is language that conveys emotion. When describing the incident in an emergency message, do not make unfounded conclusions or use emotive words. For example, “Explosion on campus” is more acceptable than “Terrorism strikes home”, the former explains more and assumes less. It is not necessary or helpful to send alerts theorizing as to whether an incident is a terrorist plot or an accident or otherwise. Sending a message with the notice “this incident does not appear to be terrorism at this time” takes up precious space in an emergency message that may be only read quickly under stress by the recipient. It is always more helpful to issue guidance rather than speculation.

Lesson #5: Include Guidance and Instruction with Every Emergency Message
In response to the outcry by parents and students after the Virginia Tech shooting, some emergency managers or school administrators may be inclined to think of emergency messages as a panacea: simply issue a emergency text message and absolve the school of potential backlash from a mishandled incident. The alert system must not be used to gradually shift the responsibility of handing an incident onto those affected by the incident. In other words, just because recipients are aware of an incident, does not enable them to become their own emergency managers, able to adequately judge risk and protect themselves in the proper fashion. Alerts should be viewed as a tool and as a means to an end, not an end itself. As part of a comprehensive emergency management system, emergency alerts should be used in conjunction with shelter-in-place and evacuation training and drills, so that when incidents occur, the community is able to respond confidently.

While the five lessons above are helpful, agencies and jurisdictions need to invest in developing emergency notification protocols specific to their intended audience. Being sensitive to the age, socioeconomic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds of the intended audience can have an impact of how well the message is understood and whether the message achieves its desired result. While emergency notification systems are clearly a useful tool, it must be used discriminatingly and with great forethought. When seconds count and lives are in danger, the right information communicated in the  proper manner can make the difference between life and death.

 

An Excerpt from the April 2012 Online Bulletin of the
International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM)

Here’s a plain text version as well:

Today FEMA turns 33! What better way to celebrate than with some lightning bolt cupcakes?

Effective April 1, 1979, FEMA was created by President Jimmy Carter with the release of Executive Order 12127, which “merged many of the separate disaster-related responsibilities into the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Among other agencies, FEMA absorbed: the Federal Insurance Administration, the National Fire Prevention and Control Administration, the National Weather Service Community Preparedness Program, the Federal Preparedness Agency of the General Services Administration and the Federal Disaster Assistance Administration activities from HUD. Civil defense responsibilities were also transferred to the new agency from the Defense Department’s Defense Civil Preparedness Agency”- (from FEMA’s history page).

As a young agency, FEMA has not only deployed to hundreds of disaster declarations, but has had to re-design its approach and methodologies several times along the way. Now, under the leadership of Administrator Fugate, FEMA seems more committed than ever to progressing emergency management doctrine in the United States–not just for the Feds, but for all levels of government. I’m really looking forward to many of the new developments. It’s an exciting time to be an emergency manager.

5. Strap and/or Secure Heavy Furniture to the Wall

Oftentimes, apartment buildings are taller than single family dwellings–which can result in more noticeable swaying at higher floors during an earthquake. By securing bookcases, filing cabinets, televisions, and other heavy items to the wall, you can decrease the risk of falling objects and subsequent injury.

4. Learn How to Turn Off Gas and Electricity in Your Apartment

A survey conducted by the Tokyo Fire Department after the Great East Japan Earthquake on March 11, 2011 found that furniture and electrical appliances fell over in nearly half of the Tokyo apartments located 11 floors up or higher. In the US, many apartments have natural gas appliances. Learning how to turn off the utilities can prevent fires and damage following a disaster. Each apartment is different though, so check with your landlord to determine how to shutoff your utilities after a disaster.

3. Keep an Extra Fire Extinguisher in a Room Other than the Kitchen

Most apartments have relatively small kitchens with a stove near the entryway. If most folks keep a fire extinguisher under the sink, the occupant might not be able to reach under the sink if the fire prohibits entry into the kitchen. Thus, it might be helpful to store an extra fire extinguisher outside of the kitchen to put out stove fires.

2. Learn the Location of Stairwells

In high-rise apartment buildings, most folks take the elevator. In an emergency though, the best method of egress might be the stairwell. More than half of occupants of World Trade Center 1 & 2 reported that they had never used a stairwell in WTC before 9/11 (NIST Report: NCSTAR-17, Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster: Occupant Behavior, Egress, and Emergency Communications). Make sure to familiarize yourself with the location of ALL stairwells in your apartment building.

1. Natural Gas Alarm

Late last year, the pilot light in my apartment’s oven went out and natural gas filled our apartment. We detected the odor of natural gas, called the fire department, and evacuated immediately. While it’s pretty common for homes to have CO2 detectors, many folks haven’t heard of natural gas detectors (Sears link here) and may have neglected to purchase a detector. The detectors usually cost less than $50 and could save your life! NIH has a great website on natural gas detectors here.

Two years ago, Rajendra Yadav was working at a scrap metal site in New Delhi, India breaking apart discarded metal appliances, car parts, and other electronics. As he used his hammer to disassemble a large machine, he noticed a shiny glimmer of metal unlike he’d ever seen before. It was small enough to put in his pocket before moving on to the next machine. As he finished work that day, he was shocked to discover burns on his hips and thighs. He died 20 days later.

It turns out that the device Mr. Yadav was hammering was an x-ray machine from Delhi University that was accidentally thrown out with the normal garbage. The shiny metal he placed in his pocket was highly radioactive and resulted in his death. Mr. Yadav’s sickness and death highlighted the threat of radioactive materials in scrap metal. But what if he hadn’t noticed the shiny metal? What if the machine was disassembled and, due to luck and shielding, the workers were not injured or alerted to the fact that there was radiation coming off of the scrap metal?

The answer is that the scrap metal would have been melted and used to create new products–like shiny metal tissue box holders.

In January of this year, the retailer Bed, Bath, & Beyond received a shipment of tissue box holders. They shipped some to brick-and-mortar stores and placed the rest for sale on their website. Some of the boxes were placed on a freight truck that was stopped at a truck scale in California when the radiation sensors sounded. This time it wasn’t a false alarm, the tissue boxes were contaminated with cobalt-60 and were definitely radioactive. Somehow, the radiation was not detected by US Customs and Border Protection at the port before it entered the US and, even worse, the product was already for sale at other stores.

Bed, Bath, & Beyond was quickly notified of the incident and began cooperating with the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The NRC usually has authority over nuclear/radioactive material licensees, but clearly Bed, Bath, & Beyond is not a traditional carrier of radioactive material. The retailer has been praised by the NRC for its transparent and full cooperation resulting in the proper removal and disposal of the tissue boxes. Since several tissue boxes were sold to consumers, the retailer has posted notices recalling the item.

In this case, the system worked–not at first inspection at the port, but nevertheless the radiation was detected. By design, we use redundancy to reduce risk. When the shipment evaded detection at the port, it was a truck scale in California that detected the anomaly.

Incidents in other countries show us how disastrous radiation can be when it goes undetected, such as the 1987 Goiânia accident in Brazil or the Taiwanese apartment buildings constructed using radioactive rebar in 1982. In Brazil, children played with, ate, and inhaled a glowing blue substance that later was determined to be highly radioactive cesium chloride taken from a medical facility that was being demolished. In Taiwan, several apartment buildings were constructed using rebar that was contaminated with radioactive medical waste. As the article linked above explains, “Eighty-nine of the 4,100 samples were diagnosed with cancer, including cervical cancer, breast cancer, liver cancer, leukemia and thyroid cancer. Researchers said that high incidence of the disease might be attributed to chronic low-dose radiation exposure. Over the course of the research period, 39 of the 89 cancer sufferers died.”

Radiation is inherently worrisome since it is odorless, invisible, and potentially lethal. While the US has a sophisticated, layered system to prevent the transport and distribution of unapproved radioactive materials, emergency managers and public health planners at the local level may need to ask themselves what courses of action are available to them if radiation was discovered in their municipality. While many agencies plan for a radiological dispersal device (RDD), or “dirty bomb”, the concept that a radiological emergency might develop slowly due to the discovery of latent radiation (in other words, radiation that piggybacks on household products or construction material due to contamination at the foundry or assembly facility) is a fairly new concept.

With the increase in use of nuclear medicine (the graph on the left shows the MRI scans per year in Canada, the US has even more), the amount of radioactive material required for nuclear medicine as well as the amount of radioactive material for disposal increases every year. The need to safeguard radioactive material and prepare for discoveries of radiation (latent or intentional) is more important than ever. A good example of the need to be prepared for unexpected radiological incidents is the “radioactive boy scout” who built his own reactor in his parents’ backyard shed in Michigan–only to have his dreams ruined when the EPA, DoE, FBI, NRC, and other Federal and local law enforcement and public health agencies raided his home.

I encourage all emergency managers and public heath planners to re-examine their radiological emergency response and recovery plans to ensure a confident and knowledgeable response/recovery not just to a RDD, but to all types of radiation and nuclear medicine-related contingencies. Then, we must ask ourselves, when was the last time we exercised these plans to make sure we have the capabilities, coordinating agencies/partners, tools, policy, protocols, procedures, and pre-scripted public information and warning required for an incident of this type?